In the interest of exploring this question, I’d like to offer three simple observations about today’s reading.
First, please note that today’s story is from the second chapter of John, not later as in the 21st chapter of Matthew, 11th chapter of Mark, or the 19th chapter of Luke. In the Gospel of John, this outburst is how Jesus’ ministry begins, with a very public demonstration of his dissatisfaction with Temple practices and a bold statement that points to both his death and resurrection, which will happen on his third Passover visit to Jerusalem, three years hence.
Second, unlike donuts, which most Eden members would agree are not integral to our faith, the cattle, sheep, doves, and money-changing were integral to the Jewish Temple practice. The animals were needed for the burnt offerings that would mitigate sin and could not be driven or carried by travelers from their homes so they were bought in Jerusalem. Offerings and Temple taxes could not be made with Roman coins bearing the image of Caesar, so the faithful exchanged them for Temple coins. While it is possible Jesus objects to the market’s location, his actions — making the whip, driving the sellers out — and his words — his Father’s house — reveal a deeper, more profound problem than market location.
Third, the underlying history of John’s gospel supports the idea that Jesus was offering a much more serious challenge to the Jewish faith and Temple system. As the ancient reader of John would have known, the Temple was destroyed by the Romans in 70 AD, at least 10 and possibly 20 years before the Gospel was circulated.
Jesus, through his Christian followers who compiled the Gospel in 80-90 AD, is critiquing a dominant system while simultaneously offering Jewish survivors a new place to meet God, a place they believed was prophesized and validated long before the Temple’s destruction, that being the crucified and risen son of God.
Read More